Tuesday, September 18, 2007

[september.12.2007.2:15pm]


could i explain love?
no.
simply no
because i believe that
my not being able to explain
it is all in its
definition.

check,
if i could explain love,
that would take away
most of the joy
i had in loving someone.
to me,
the fact that
no matter how many words i
choose
and to still be
incompetent
to convey
my love for someone,
or to be
unsatisfied
at my attempts
to explain
my love,
is the territory
love comes with.


ive been in love.
i love a lot of people
and i love myself.
but i wont ever be
able to explain it
just because love is
so relative.

its something that
can exist
without it being
mutual.
its a form of its own
and frankly,
i think no one
has no choice but to love.
even if they dont
or cant love.
theyd love to know
what love is,
so ultimately,
theyre "loving".


so,
no.
i cant explain it.
dont want to.
i just know that
when two people
reach a point
in her or his
life when
they find a love
they arent
required to explain,
then there it is...
true love in one of its purest forms:
inexplicable.



and as for certain
levels of love?


there arent any levels.
this isnt a super nintendo
super mario brothers
game console.
if there were levels
then one could choose
to go up,
or down,
but shit doesnt
work like that.

id say that love
is based on which the
lens you observe
it through.
either that lens be
tainted,
cracked,
blurred,
or not there at
all...

1 comment:

LiSAMACkin said...

i really like this you managed to partically explain it while still hidding the best parts of love